So this is what your kind does when they can’t refute the points, huh? I make no apologies for calling out those who coddle advertent negligence.
Here’s something far more on topic than obvious, sophmoric attempts of muddying the waters & obfuscations: did it not occur to anyone ITT the -safety=none switch should have the requirement of being followed by --YESIKNOWWHATIAMDOING before accepting & executing?
It’s gobsmacking I have to point any of this out.
Now go ahead; false flag this post. Prove me right, again.
